To its credit, it uses the same backup format on all destinations (probably not alone there), which means restoring massive amounts of data over a slow Internet connection has a way out, if shipping is possible. I just wanted to get a Duplicati point in. Its search ability is rather crude, and it’s beta, so don’t delete originals… Your response sounds like you have another archive plan though. Duplicati is not an archiver intended to archive-and-delete. The archive point at Reddit reminds me of something that I say occasionally. Not me (to get that out of the way first).īest solution for back ups from Mac to Synology NAS to Cloud, and Searchable and Partial and or Full Restores from Cloud? looks like the same question asked to a wider audience, and getting some input.ĭuplicati’s pro and con of having a local database means maybe it’s easier to search (but I can’t say for sure that Arq can’t, since I don’t run it, or Time Machine, or NAS, or minion). I see many other people asking similar questions on reddit and on duplicati forums, but did not find one solution being perfect for this situation and wasn’t sure if the information was up to date.ĭoes anyone have an ideal solution, to note would only ever be backing up Macs. But not sure how the restore process works in either case in the scenario where I want to search the old backups for a certain file, and restore just that or in the event I need to do a full restore of the latest backup. Either using it to backup to NAS and then NAS uses something else to backup to Cloud or use something else to backup to NAS and Duplicati from nas to cloud. Sounds like duplicati while not as pretty, may work better. And wouldn’t be able to easily search for and restore one file from the cloud in that scenario easily, would probably have to restore the whole thing or something which would be terrible. But then if I need to do a full restore sounds like it would be rather challenging since can’t restore from the cloud to the computer and skip nas. The problem here is along with backing up to NAS I’d need to backup from Mac to cloud which wouldn’t be ideal, since I don’t want it backing up to cloud when using the computer and since laptop wouldn’t be able to easily backup consistently when not using the computer.Ĭould backup from Mac through Arq to Nas using minion, or such, and then use NAS Cloud Sync supposedly up to the cloud. Backing up via Arq to say Google Cloud Nearline or more likely Cold storage would make a lot of sense since can back up endlessly, and backups all Mac’s meta data, so could either backup a whole instance if house burnt down with computer and nas, but far more likely situation is needing to access and old file and with the GUI I could access and download that one file. Time Machine would support that, but don’t trust it to keep endless backups as eventually will probably get corrupted, and its not as efficient as backup storage. Such as maybe I had a file but deleted it later on but some day need it again. If Time Machine gets corrupted or that drive days I have my actual computer so can simply redo the backup and get another external drive or such.īut need a solution for old backups. This way incase something happens to my computer which is a more common scenario, I can reformat and restore from Time Machine and be up and running incredibly quickly just where I left off. Yes, Time Machine can be unreliable, but plan on only using it for backing up my latest 1 or 2 backups. One drive will be a smaller SSD for backing up from new MBP via Time Machine via ethernet. Got a Synology network device that will hold 4 drives. I’m working on a more robust situation to cover the rare potential disaster as well as more common use cases. Over the years have used many types of backups including Time Machine, Arq and S3, Google Cloud, as well as Dropbox, Google Drive, and iCloud.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |